Use tools truthfully
Drafts should be accurate, privacy-aware, and based on what the visitor can support with records, dates, direct messages, or personal experience.
By using Pain Care Rights, visitors acknowledge that the site exists for education, advocacy, public awareness, and patient-resource tools. It is not an emergency, medical, legal, or case-management service.
The terms keep the boundaries plain: visitors are responsible for accurate drafts, privacy-aware use, lawful conduct, and choosing the right professional or official channel for serious needs.
Use the site for education and advocacy, not urgent help, individualized advice, or automatic complaint submission.
Visitors may not use the site to seek emergency help, harass others, publish private information, impersonate others, submit false claims, or engage in unlawful activity.
The site may discuss medicine, law, policy, and patient experiences, but it does not provide individualized medical advice, legal advice, diagnosis, treatment, prescriptions, or emergency response.
Any interactive feature requires moderation rules that prohibit threats, doxxing, spam, illegal activity, personal attacks, and unsafe medical instructions before it is opened to the public.
Visitors are responsible for reviewing drafts before using them outside the site, removing unnecessary private details, checking names and dates, and making sure the final message reflects their own situation accurately.
The tools are meant to help people organize facts and communicate clearly. They should not be used to impersonate anyone, harass people, publish private information, or turn unsupported claims into accusations.
Dates, names, quotes, symptoms, records, and requests should be checked before a draft leaves the visitor’s device.
Review packet →Stories and public posts should avoid unnecessary identifiers, unsupported accusations, and private details that can harm the patient later.
Prepare story safely →A hospital grievance, medical board complaint, pharmacy issue, insurance barrier, record request, or policy message may each belong in a different lane.
Review route standards →A careful message can be firm without becoming unsafe. The goal is organized advocacy, not threats, doxxing, impersonation, or reckless publishing.